The Combat Field Pack M-1990 (CFP-90) is designed as the backpack part of the Individual Integrated Fighting System (IIFS). The IIFS was developed as an update to replace the All-Purpose Lightweight Individual Carrying Equipment (ALICE) for U.S. Army soldiers. Specifically, the IIFS was supposed to bring in a new era of tactical load carrying equipment that did not rely on shoulder harness suspenders and individual equipment belts. A more even and healthy weight distribution for the soldiers was the goal. Although designed as a replacement for the ALICE system, several ALICE components are used with the IIFS. These include a water canteen cover, entrenching too carrier and the field first aid dressing case.
The IIFS has different tactical packs and vests that are either categorized as fighting load or existence load. The CFP-90 Field Backpack is an existence load component and is an internal frame pack constructed of 8.0-ounce backcoated nylon fabric for durability and water repellent qualities. The 8-pound pack is divided into two major sections, one for the sleeping bag and a main section above it. A false bottom allows the pack to be utilized as one large compartment when a sleeping bag is not being carried. Additional storage is found in the form of one long pocket and two cargo pockets on the exterior of the pack. Compression straps help to fasten components, and loops are located throughout the pack for further equipment attachment.
The aluminum internal frame is removable and the suspension system is adjustable. Lower pack padding, lumbar support and shoulder pads constructed of bi-laminate foam provide additional comfort and support. The CFP-90 is designed to work in combination with other parts of the IIFS system. The combat patrol pack can be strapped on top of the field pack, and tactical vests can be worn under the shoulder straps of the field pack.
The IIFS is still in use by the U.S. Army, although it will be replaced at some time by the Modular Lightweight Load-Carrying Equipment (MOLLE) system.
{ 0 comments }
